Ad Parnassum Paul Klee Buy Art Prints Now
from Amazon

* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.


by
Tom Gurney BSc (Hons) is an art history expert with over 20 years experience
Published on June 19, 2020 / Updated on September 27, 2026
Email: tomgurney1@gmail.com / Phone: +44 7429 011000

A mountain built from colour and time

From a distance Paul Klee’s Ad Parnassum appears to offer a simple structure: a broad triangle rising above an arch, with an orange circle near the upper right. Move closer and the apparently solid mountain becomes a field of small colour units. Beneath them lie larger square divisions and bands; dark slanting lines give the triangle its roof-like edge. The arch feels like an entrance, yet it does not open onto an ordinary building. Klee made recognition and abstraction work together, allowing a viewer to see a mountain, pyramid or constructed form while still seeing the many decisions that built it.[1][2]

The painting is unusually revealing because Klee left a technical account of its making. He described a sequence from casein-painted squares on unprimed canvas through white oil subdivision and coloured glaze to the warm circle and oil lines. Conservators later examined the original and explained the immense labour behind the small marks. These sources allow a closer account than the common label “pointillist painting,” while also showing why a summary or reproduction cannot answer every question about the object.[2][3]

Contents

  1. The work in Bern
  2. What Klee said he did
  3. A mountain, pyramid and title
  4. Points and polyphony
  5. How the work entered the Bern collection
  6. Why a six-minute journey mattered
  7. Looking again

The work in Bern

Klee made Ad Parnassum in 1932, during his Düsseldorf Academy years. His annual number is 1932,274; a specialist sale catalogue cites the later catalogue raisonné number 5970. Kunstmuseum Bern’s current detailed checklist gives a size of 100 × 126 cm, inventory G 1427, and an original painted wooden frame. The owner credit belongs to the Verein der Freunde, the museum’s Friends association. The picture has been on long-term loan to Kunstmuseum Bern since 1935. These numbers and relationships serve different purposes: 1932,274 locates the work in Klee’s own annual sequence, 5970 in the later catalogue raisonné, and G 1427 in the museum’s inventory. The museum is its home, while the Friends association is credited as owner.[1][2][3][4]

The checklist describes oil paint, white points subsequently painted over, casein paint on canvas on a stretcher, stamped lines and the original frame. This is a mixed-medium work, not simply oil on canvas. The casein layer, oil touches and glazes are integral to the appearance of the triangle. A derivative description that omits them makes the image seem simpler than its construction. Nor is the frame merely a later presentation accessory: Bern’s record identifies it as original and painted, although its exact role in Klee’s intended colour experience still deserves closer technical study.[1]

The size matters too. At a metre high and more than a metre wide, the work asks for movement: at one distance the apex and orange circle organise the whole; nearer the surface, the many small units separate and the square structure becomes easier to see. A 400-pixel reproduction can show the overall arrangement but cannot faithfully communicate the brushwork, translucency, frame or condition. The painting’s scale and layers are part of why it has remained a central object for both art historians and conservators.[1][3]

What Klee said he did

Zentrum Paul Klee transcribes Klee’s five-part “Attest des Künstlers.” He began with a square division in casein colour on unprimed canvas. He then made a finer subdivision with white oil paint and glazed that division with oil colours thinned using turpentine and some painting medium. The warm circle was added in oil, and finally the line in oil. This source is unusually close to the artist’s own process. The published museum text is a transcription, however, rather than a facsimile of the original attestation inspected for this article. It establishes the sequence Klee reported; it does not by itself show every tool stroke.[2]

Conservators Nathalie Bäschlin and Michael Baumgartner wrote a fuller, examination-based account for the work’s special 2007 presentation. They date Klee’s explanation to 1936. They describe the casein as thin enough for the canvas weave to remain visible, and they identify a linear underdrawing beneath the later colour. According to them, Klee applied more than 15,000 small white-oil touches with a fine flat brush, then glazed each separately. He made the oil lines by dipping the edge of small spatulas or plates into paint and stamping them onto the surface. The exact count and method are their technical report, not something a reader could verify by counting marks in a small web image.[3]

This close account also exposes a source difference. Bern’s concise 2026 checklist says the points were initially stamped in white and then painted over; Bäschlin and Baumgartner say the white touches were applied with a fine flat brush, while the lines were stamped with tool edges. Those statements should not be silently turned into one unqualified recipe. They may refer to different types of marks or reflect compressed checklist language. The original technical photographs and full conservation proceedings are needed to reconcile the wording. For the visitor, the secure point is that Klee combined a square-painted foundation, thousands of oil touches and glaze, then a small number of forceful structural marks.[1][3]

The order changes how the finished picture can be read. The first square division remains beneath the later small touches; it gives the surface a larger rhythm even where the eye is drawn to tiny colour units. White touches create places for translucent colour to modulate. The warm circle and dark line do not merely sit beside the little marks; they were late decisions that sharpened the whole. Because the final shapes emerge through successive layers, “dots make a mountain” understates what Klee did. Surface, large geometry and later contour all participate.[2][3]

A mountain, pyramid and title

The triangle is clear, but what kind of triangle? The apex and sloping sides invite a mountain; the regularity also evokes a pyramid or roof. A dark horizontal divides upper and lower areas, while the arch at lower left resembles a gate. The orange circle may suggest sun, moon or another source of warmth, but the painting does not document its astronomical identity or a particular time of day. The forms are specific enough to be followed with the eye and open enough for several places or ideas to overlap.[1][2]

The Latin title Ad Parnassum means roughly “to” or “toward Parnassus.” In Greek mythology Parnassus was associated with Apollo and the Muses. Zentrum Paul Klee describes Klee’s recurring mountain and pyramid motifs and reads this painting as a possible image of artistic striving, travel and contact with other cultures. Such associations help explain why a mountain need not be only a landscape here. They remain curatorial interpretations rather than a literal map to the Greek mountain or a statement written by Klee about every shape.[2]

Nina Zimmer, writing in German, proposes that the Swiss Niesen, with its almost pyramidal outline when seen from Lake Thun, is probably in view. She also sees an Egyptian-pyramid association and asks whether the title could express Klee’s sense of having reached a summit in his own work. Her words “probably” and “perhaps” matter. No Niesen study or Egyptian sketch has been tied to this exact composition in the accessible object records. The picture can join a Swiss mountain, an ancient pyramid and a mythic seat of the arts in the viewer’s mind without becoming a topographical view of all three.[5]

The arch complicates a single mountain reading. It puts a human-scale opening below the immense triangle, as though the viewer might enter the image’s structure. Its curved top contrasts with the sloping sides and the orange circle. The arch has no fully described depth, passage or destination, however; the small squares continue around it. It may be a gate, part of a building or a compositional counter-shape. Calling it an “entrance” describes an invitation in the form, not a proven narrative in which Klee or a pilgrim climbs toward artistic achievement.[1]

Points and polyphony

Ad Parnassum belongs to a larger group of roughly seventy so-called point pictures Klee made while teaching in Düsseldorf in 1931–32, according to Zimmer. She compares their small touches with the divisionist experiments of Georges Seurat and Paul Signac but stresses that Klee used the principle more freely. The word “pointillist” can therefore orient a new reader, but it should not imply that Klee copied Seurat’s optical programme or joined a nineteenth-century movement. His casein squares, white-oil touches, glaze and stamped lines make a distinctive layered procedure.[5][2][3]

Zimmer calls this complexity “polyphonic.” In music, polyphony allows distinct voices to sound together. In the painting, one can attend to the square ground, the small touches, the changing colours, the triangle, the arch and the orange circle without reducing any of them to a single supporting part. Oskar Bätschmann’s book on Ad Parnassum is expressly devoted to Klee’s polyphonic painting, colour and the rhythm of points; its publisher synopsis establishes the book’s subject, but the book itself has not yet been read for this page. Thus polyphony is a useful historical and curatorial analogy here, not a claim that each coloured touch corresponds to a note in a score.[5][6]

Klee’s other works of the Düsseldorf period likewise experiment with layered colour and musical language. The comparison is useful because it shows a sustained problem rather than a single painting produced in isolation. It does not make the pictures a documented triptych or establish an exact day-by-day production order. The title Ad Parnassum may also call to mind musical exercises that use Parnassus as a metaphor for ascent, but a specific influence from a named treatise or composition needs documentary evidence beyond a shared phrase.[5][6]

A report from the 2006 Bern colloquium proposed a dialogue between the painting and Swiss composer Albert Möschinger’s Clementi-Hütte, dated 1940, and suggested that Klee might have had Muzio Clementi’s Gradus ad Parnassum in mind. The first is necessarily a retrospective comparison: a 1940 composition could not have shaped Klee’s painting in 1932. The second is a hypothesis, not a documented quotation from Klee. Both can enrich a history of reception, but they should not become a confident account of what Klee heard while making the painting.[7]

How the work entered the Bern collection

Klee showed a large group of his own works at Kunsthalle Bern in 1935, after returning from Düsseldorf to Switzerland. The ZPK-sponsored report on the 2006 colloquium says that the Friends association bought Ad Parnassum directly from him that year and placed it on long-term loan with Kunstmuseum Bern. The association’s current museum page confirms that it acquired the painting, and ZPK confirms the loan from 1935. This matters because accounts that simply call it a museum purchase erase the role of the private supporters who acted for the museum at a time when modern art still met scepticism locally.[7][8][2]

Art historian Michael Baumgartner’s study of Kunsthalle director Max Huggler gives the purchase a more precise setting. He reports that Ad Parnassum was the largest painting in the 1935 Bern exhibition and that the Friends paid 4,000 Swiss francs for it, roughly the annual wage of the Kunsthalle’s caretaker. Baumgartner describes that price as relatively modest for a Klee painting, while also showing why it could look extravagant in Bern’s public debate. He cites sceptical contemporary responses to Klee’s art and to the prices charged for it. That tension helps explain the Friends’ importance: the purchase committed private supporters to a work whose later stature was not yet assured locally.[9]

Baumgartner relays earlier scholar Samuel Vitali’s suggestion that the painting’s comparatively approachable subject or price may have eased the purchase. These are proposed explanations for the choice, not stated motives in a purchase document. The sale, sum and exhibition context are more secure than a claim about what every Friend or curator thought. Baumgartner also traces Huggler’s initial uncertainty about Klee through correspondence and his later change of view; this story makes the acquisition part of a developing local encounter with modern art, rather than a simple tale of unanimous recognition.[9]

The directly quoted artist attestation may belong to the history of the sale or later documentation, but the accessible ZPK transcription does not itself provide the original sheet, recipient or full date. Bäschlin and Baumgartner call Klee’s process account a 1936 document, a year after the Friends’ purchase. It should therefore not be represented as a note he necessarily handed to the buyers in 1935. The original document and the full Bern archival study would help settle its purpose and path.[2][3]

The 2006 account links the acquisition to the Bern Kunsthalle retrospective and notes Hanni Bürgi’s support for that show. A later museum interview with Zimmer identifies Max Huggler’s proposal to buy Ad Parnassum and says the Friends made the purchase possible. These are useful institutional memories; the original sale correspondence and complete 1935 catalogue remain a priority for a fully documented acquisition account. The simpler facts are already strong: an object Klee still owned was sold into a local support network, became an enduring loan to the museum and retains the Friends’ ownership credit.[7][8][2]

Why a six-minute journey mattered

The painting’s fragility is not an abstract warning attached to all old art. Bäschlin and Baumgartner describe a canvas whose tension had slackened and a weakly bound, relatively inelastic paint layer with tiny cracks and losses at points where the weave crosses. Movement, vibration and shifts in humidity could stress the layers. The ZPK’s 2007–08 exhibition account likewise links brittleness and uncertain adhesion to Klee’s unusual combination of casein and oil. These are conservation observations from that period; they do not prove the picture’s precise condition or loan policy in 2026.[3][2]

The work had not left Kunstmuseum Bern for fourteen years when ZPK sought to include it in its 2007 presentation. The short distance did not automatically make travel safe. The conservators made a test painting of comparable size and weight, with related support properties, and equipped a climate crate with instruments to record temperature, relative humidity and shocks. An accelerometer on the stretcher measured vibration during an approximately six-minute drive between the institutions. The 2006 colloquium report notes that packing, unpacking or rehanging could subject an object to more jolts than a carefully controlled short ride.[2][3][7]

The controlled transfer was approved for the ZPK exhibition, but the conservators warned against repeated trips because damage risk accumulates; the long-distance loan restriction remained in place at that time. This is a story about careful measurement changing a decision, not about declaring the painting safe to travel generally. Klee’s experimental making gave the picture its visual richness and produced a surface requiring special stewardship. The physical work and the image it offers cannot be separated.[3]

Looking again

Start at the orange circle and follow the small marks into the triangular field. Watch how the larger square divisions persist beneath the finer touches. Then trace the dark sloping edge to the apex and down the other side; it gives the mountain or roof a certainty that the interior texture does not. Return to the arch and ask whether it seems cut into the triangle, placed in front of it or built from the same field. The painting allows these relations to shift as one moves between whole and detail.[1][2]

The title offers Parnassus, the picture offers a triangle and gate, and Klee’s documented procedure offers successive physical layers. Bern’s ownership and conservation records add another history: a 1935 direct sale into the Friends’ collection and a carefully tested short loan decades later. What remains uncertain is equally worth keeping clear: the precise source of the mountain, the status of musical allusions beyond curatorial analogy, the technical wording conflict between checklist and conservators, and the painting’s present condition. These open questions need fuller archives and the dedicated monograph, not a simpler story imposed on the thousands of marks.[1][2][3][5]

Explore Klee’s materials and techniques for more about his varied supports, his colour studies for the wider context, and the paintings overview for other works from the Düsseldorf and Bern years.

Explore selected works from Klee’s much larger oeuvre. Titles without a link have an authenticated catalogue identity but no reviewed article yet.

Artworks directory

217 artworks

NameDateMedium
A Gate1939Painting and mixed media
A Woman for Gods1938Watercolour and mixed media
Ab Ovo1917Watercolour and mixed media
Above Mountain Summit1917Drawing and mixed media
Abstract Trio1923Drawing and mixed media
Acrobats1915Watercolour and mixed media
Actor's Mask1924Painting and mixed media
Ad Marginem1930Drawing and mixed media
Ad Parnassum1932Painting and mixed media
Adventurer Ship1927Drawing and mixed media
Affected Place1922Drawing and mixed media
After a Sketch from Zurich1914Watercolour and mixed media
After Drawing1919Print
After The Floods1936Watercolour and mixed media
All Souls' Picture1921Print
Ancient Harmony1925Painting and mixed media
Angel Applicant1939Drawing and mixed media
Angel Serves the Desired1920Print
Angel, Still Female1939Painting and mixed media
Angelus Novus1920Drawing and mixed media
Animal Terror1926Painting and mixed media
Arab Song1932Painting and mixed media
Archangel1938Painting and mixed media
Architecture1923Painting and mixed media
Architecture of the Plain1923Drawing and mixed media
Around the Fish1926Painting and mixed media
Arrival of the Air Steamer1921Drawing and mixed media
Asiatic God1924Painting and mixed media
Astrological Fantasy Portrait1924Drawing and mixed media
Athlete's Head1932Watercolour and mixed media
Aufgehender Stern1931Painting and mixed media
Autumn Flower1922Painting and mixed media
Bad Band1920Drawing and mixed media
Baroque Centaur1939Painting and mixed media
Before the Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Before the Snow1929Drawing and mixed media
Besessenes Madchen1924Watercolour and mixed media
Bird Garden1924Print
Bird Wandering Off1926Watercolour and mixed media
Blossoms in the Night1930Watercolour and mixed media
Blue-Bird-Pumpkin1939Painting and mixed media
Boats in the Flood1937Painting and mixed media
Botanical Theatre1934Drawing and mixed media
Boy in Fancy Dress1931Watercolour and mixed media
Broken Key1938Print
Brother and Sister1930Watercolour and mixed media
But the Red Roof1935Painting and mixed media
C - C = Fisch1931Watercolour and mixed media
Cacti1912Painting and mixed media
Camel (in Rhythmic Landscape with Trees)1920Drawing and mixed media
Captive Pierrot1923Drawing and mixed media
Castle and Sun1928Drawing and mixed media
Cat and Bird1928Drawing and mixed media
Cathedrals1925Watercolour and mixed media
Chalice of the Heart1937Painting and mixed media
Characters in Yellow1937Painting and mixed media
Chosen Site1927Mixed media
Christmas Picture1923Drawing and mixed media
City of Towers1916Painting and mixed media
Clarification1932Painting and mixed media
Collection of Figurines1926Painting and mixed media
Colorful Architecture1917Painting and mixed media
Comedians' Handbill1938Print
Comic Opera Singer1927Painting and mixed media
Composition1939Painting and mixed media
Composition with Figures1915Drawing and mixed media
Composition with the Yellow Half-Moon and the Y1918Watercolour and mixed media
Conch–Still Life II1939Watercolour and mixed media
Cosmic Composition1919Painting and mixed media
Crystal Gradation1921Drawing and mixed media
Dance of the Grieving Child1922Painting and mixed media
Dancing Girl1940Painting and mixed media
Das Licht und Etliches1931Mixed media
Death and Fire1940Painting and mixed media
Death for the Idea1915Print
Demon as Pirate1926Watercolour and mixed media
Diana1931Painting and mixed media
Diavolo Player1923Drawing and mixed media
Die Kapelle1917Watercolour and mixed media
Die Vase1938Painting and mixed media
Doctor1930Drawing and mixed media
Dredger and Sailboat1931Watercolour and mixed media
Ein Tor1939Painting and mixed media
Ein Weib fur Gotter1938Mixed media
Embrace1939Watercolour and mixed media
Episode before an Arab Town1923Print
Equals Infinity1932Painting and mixed media
Eros1923Drawing and mixed media
Error on Green1930Watercolour and mixed media
Evening Figure1935Drawing and mixed media
Falling Bird1919Print
Fermata1932Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Clown1921Watercolour and mixed media
Fire Full Moon1933Watercolour and mixed media
Fire in the Evening1929Painting and mixed media
Fish in the Harbour1916Watercolour and mixed media
Fish Magic1925Watercolour and mixed media
Flock of Birds1917Drawing and mixed media
Flora on Sand1927Watercolour and mixed media
Flower Myth1918Print
Flower Stand with Watering Can and Bucket1910Watercolour and mixed media
Flowering Tree (Abstraction with Reference to a Flowering Tree)1925Painting and mixed media
Flowers in Pots1923Print
Flowers in Stone1939Painting and mixed media
Forest Witch1938Painting and mixed media
Fright of a Girl1922Drawing and mixed media
Fruits on Red1930Drawing and mixed media
Full Moon1919Mixed media
Föhn Wind in Franz Marc's Garden1915Watercolour and mixed media
Garden in St Germain, The European Quarter near Tunis1914Watercolour and mixed media
Ghost Chamber with the Tall Door (New Version)1925Print
Ghost of a Genius1922Drawing and mixed media
Girl in Mourning1939Painting and mixed media
Glance of a Landscape1926Watercolour and mixed media
Gluht Nach1939Drawing and mixed media
Golden Fish1925Watercolour and mixed media
Goldfish Wife1921Watercolour and mixed media
Green Plant, Blood, Louse1924Drawing and mixed media
Hafenbild1918Mixed media
Hammamet with Mosque1914Watercolour and mixed media
Harbour with Sailing Ships1937Painting and mixed media
Hauptweg und Nebenwege1929Painting and mixed media
Heavenly and Earthly Time1927Drawing and mixed media
Heroic Fiddling1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Roses1938Painting and mixed media
Heroic Strokes of the Bow—Mixed media
Highway and Byways1929Drawing and mixed media
Houses near the Gravel Pit1913Watercolour and mixed media
Howling Dog1928Painting and mixed media
In the Current Six Thresholds1929Painting and mixed media
In the Style of Kairouan1914Drawing and mixed media
Individualized Altimetry of Stripes1930Painting and mixed media
Insula Dulcamara1938Print
Interior with the Clock1913Watercolour and mixed media
Irma Rossa the Animal Tamer1918Drawing and mixed media
Journey in Corsica1927Drawing and mixed media
Landscape with Bluebirds1919Watercolour and mixed media
Legend of the Nile1937Painting and mixed media
Lemon Harvest1937Watercolour and mixed media
Likeness in the Bower1930Watercolour and mixed media
Limits of Reason1927Painting and mixed media
Little Hope1938Watercolour and mixed media
Magdalena before the Conversion1938Drawing and mixed media
Mask of Fear1932Painting and mixed media
May Picture1925Painting and mixed media
Monument in a Cemetery1922Watercolour and mixed media
Monuments at G1929Watercolour and mixed media
Municipal Jewel1917Watercolour and mixed media
Mural from the Temple of Longing Thither1922Print
Nach der Uberschwemmung1936Watercolour and mixed media
New Harmony1936Painting and mixed media
New House in the Suburbs—Mixed media
Old Steamboat1922Drawing and mixed media
On the Edge1930Drawing and mixed media
Once Emerged from the Gray of Night1918Drawing and mixed media
One Who Understands1934Painting and mixed media
Oriental Pleasure Garden1925Painting and mixed media
Park of Idols1939Watercolour and mixed media
Passing by Red Pillars1928Watercolour and mixed media
Persian Nightingales1917Drawing and mixed media
Popular Wall Painting1922Painting and mixed media
Prestidigitator1927Watercolour and mixed media
Rainy Day1931Watercolour and mixed media
Red and White Domes1914Watercolour and mixed media
Red Balloon1922Drawing and mixed media
Redgreen and Violet-Yellow Rhythms1920Drawing and mixed media
Refuge1930Watercolour and mixed media
Rhythmic Rythmical1930Painting and mixed media
Saint of the Inner Light1921Print
Scaffolding of a New Building1930Painting and mixed media
Scholar in Dealing with Stars1926Watercolour and mixed media
Seated Woman1930Drawing and mixed media
Senecio1922Painting and mixed media
Separation in the Evening1922Drawing and mixed media
Sinbad the Sailor1923Drawing and mixed media
Skeptically Smiling—Mixed media
Small House in the Garden City1928Watercolour and mixed media
Small Portrait of a Girl in Yellow1925Painting and mixed media
Southern Gardens1919Watercolour and mixed media
Static-Dynamic Gradation1923Drawing and mixed media
Still Life1927Painting and mixed media
Still Life with Gladioli1932Watercolour and mixed media
Strange Garden1923Drawing and mixed media
Stricken City1936Painting and mixed media
Strong Dream1929Watercolour and mixed media
Struck from the List1933Drawing and mixed media
Structural I1924Drawing and mixed media
Sumpflegende1919Painting and mixed media
Temple Gardens1920Drawing and mixed media
The Arrow before the Target1921Drawing and mixed media
The Barbed Noose with the Mice1923Watercolour and mixed media
The Flora of the Heath1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Goldfish1925Watercolour and mixed media
The Hour Before One Night1940Painting and mixed media
The Man in Love1923Print
The Mask with the Flag1925Mixed media
The Pathos of Fertility1921Print
The Rhine at Duisburg1937Painting and mixed media
The Way to the Citadel1937Painting and mixed media
Three Houses and a Bridge1922Watercolour and mixed media
Tightrope Walker1923Print
Tomb in Three Parts1923Watercolour and mixed media
Tomcat's Turf1919Watercolour and mixed media
Tower in Orange and Green1922Drawing and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms I1920Watercolour and mixed media
Tree and Architecture - Rhythms II1920Painting and mixed media
Tropical Dawn with the Owl1921Mixed media
Tropische Dammerung1921Painting and mixed media
Twittering Machine1922Drawing and mixed media
Variations (Progressive Motif)1927Watercolour and mixed media
Ventriloquist and Crier in the Moor1923Print
Viaducts Break Ranks1937Drawing and mixed media
Villa R1919Painting and mixed media
Village Carnival1926Painting and mixed media
Vor dem Blitz1923Drawing and mixed media
Wald-Hexen1938Painting and mixed media
Young Forest1925Drawing and mixed media

Discussion

The mountain, gate, circle and many colour touches reward looking at both the whole and the surface.

The conservators' records also show how Klee's experiment affected the painting's later care.

Reader Insights

Close Looking

Do you see the triangle first as a mountain, pyramid or roof?

Context

Where do the larger squares remain visible beneath the small touches?

Open Question

What would the original technical photographs clarify about the white points?

Join the Conversation

Share an observation about the painting or a source that helps explain it.

References

  1. Kunstmuseum Bern, June 2026 collection display checklist, entry for Ad Parnassum, p. 10 (German), View source.
  2. Zentrum Paul Klee, “Sammlungspräsentation: Ad Parnassum,” 2007–08 exhibition account, including Klee’s transcribed “Attest des Künstlers” and conservation/loan summary (German), View source.
  3. Nathalie Bäschlin and Michael Baumgartner, “Das Meisterwerk «Ad Parnassum» zu Besuch im Zentrum Paul Klee,” ensuite 54/55 (German, June 2007), p. 69; authored conservation and exhibition account, View source.
  4. Galerie Kornfeld, 2024 specialist sale catalogue, lot 172, citing Catalogue raisonné Paul Klee vol. 6, no. 5970 for Ad Parnassum (German; catalogue raisonné itself still to be checked), View source.
  5. Nina Zimmer, “Nina Zimmer über Paul Klee,” Parnass (German, 12 September 2017); essay on the point-picture group, Niesen and the title, View source.
  6. University of Chicago Press / Scheidegger & Spiess, description of Oskar Bätschmann, Paul Klee—Ad Parnassum (English publisher synopsis, 2021/22); cited only for the book’s scope, View source.
  7. Zentrum Paul Klee-sponsored report, “Auf dem Prüfstand,” ensuite 47 (German, November 2006), p. 31; contemporaneous colloquium report printed as a promotional page, View source.
  8. Kunstmuseum Bern / Verein der Freunde, “Freundeswerke,” association acquisition note (French-language museum site), View source.
  9. Michael Baumgartner, “Max Huggler und Paul Klee: Spuren einer Begegnung,” Zwitscher-Maschine 11 (2022), pp. 109–21, especially pp. 111–13 and note 9; German specialist study, View source.